While those two states offer a chance for candidates to practice the retail politics not possible in places like California or New York, issues of particular importance to minority communities are generally ignored. In Iowa, Latinos make up a little less than three percent of the population while African Americans make up two percent. In New Hampshire, Latinos constitute less than two percent of the population and African Americans make up less than one percent. This is likely why, during the 2004 primary season, former Illinois Sen. Carol Mosley Braun only visited New Hampshire seven times and the Rev. Al Sharpton only three.
Yet as pivotal as the press often makes Iowa and New Hampshire seem, it could be South Carolina that gives candidates the Big Mo this year. This is particularly true for the Democratic primary. The Palmetto State is the third in the triple crown of presidential primaries, but it's the first where minorities play a major role. Half the voters in the 2004 Democratic Primary in South Carolina were African American. Similar numbers are expected this year.
South Carolina's Republican Primary usually revolves around white male voters and, for now, that seems unlikely to change. According to a recent Winthrop University/ETV poll, though, two-thirds of registered Republicans in South Carolina think their party needs to do more to reach out to minority voters. Since the state holds an open primary, African Americans could send a wake-up call to the frontrunners by voting for an underdog like Ron Paul or Mike Huckabee.
Latino voters have been growing in South Carolina, but it's Nevada where that demographic could really swing things. In the most mercurial political calendar in decades, Nevada has moved its caucuses to January 19. It remains to be seen whether this will trump South Carolina's prominence (only one percent of all eligible voters turned out in '04), but with 13 percent of the electorate in 2006, Latinos could potentially tip the scales in this now-early contest.
Leaders in both states' parties admit they moved their primaries and caucuses up from March to January, in large part, to force the candidates to reach out to a more diverse voting bloc. Whether this translates into higher turnout at the polls remains to be seen. But the game has inarguably changed.
del.icio.us
digg
Furl
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Comments
1.
Nick says:
view profile
Ron Paul has ben accused of being racist by anyone trying to smear him. To set the record straight, it should be noted he fired the staffer who published racist comments in his newsletter (while he was away) that led to the racism charge.
In all of Ron Paul's writings, he avoids collectivist rhetoric completely, focusing on either individuals or the nation as a whole. If he truly were racist, he likely would not have appeared at the Morgan State minority issues debate (where Giuliani, Romney, Thomspon, and McCain were absent), he likely would not have called Martin Luther King, Jr one of his heroes (for Dr. King's civil disobedience along with Muhatma Ghandi), he likely would not have tried to get every Congressperson to pitch in $100 to give Rosa Parks a medal rather than taxing all Americans (which would have meant Congresspersons actually paid nothing since they have a different taxation structure), and he likely would not be considering Walter Williams, a black economist from Philadelphia, as his VP.
Ron Paul meetups across the country have been the most diverse this election year, and probably ever.
November 16, 2007 at 2:45 pm
2.
William says:
view profile
Ron Paul will end the income tax, end the war on drugs, and bring home our troops.
November 16, 2007 at 2:20 pm